One of the very best blogs with a solid focus on Google is Google Operating System (GOS). This site provides well-documented and clearly explained Google news (ie. a new feature) many times long before others report on it a or Google makes an official announcement.
This time, GOS posted an article about phrase searching, aka searching for phrases using quotation marks. The item specifically points out a "shortcut" that once worked is no longer available. What makes the post even more interesting is a link to a page of documentation about Google advanced search. So, GOS gets kudos this time for starting a discussion on the topic.
Google's documentation notes that, "quotes are usually unnecessary for phase searching." We can save the discussion about when and when not to use for another time. However, here are a few things we came across in the past day.
A) "Usually Unnecessary" doesn't mean 100% of the time. Quotes still work but even using them doesn't mean that the precise phrase you enter between the quotation marks is exactly what will be returned.
B) This documentation discussing the quote/exact phrase search is not new. We know it is at least 8+ months old. Here's an archived page with the same text about phrase searching from October 2009.
C) It's interesting that when use using Google's advance search interface and place terms in the "this exact wording or phrase" box, the search terms are automatically surrounded with quotation marks. So, even if Google says they're usually unnecessary, Google still utilizes them on one of their user interfaces. Add a few terms or phrase to the "this exact wording or phrase" box and you can see for yourself.
So, if you are learning or training someone how to use Google and have moved on to the advanced interface, you might if the quotes are really needed? Having them appear when using the advanced interface sends a strong signal that they're probably worth using.
So, even when you search for a specific phrase with the quotation marks, they don't always make a difference, at least for the first few results (where most people look) with this search.
2. Google provides Alexander Graham Bell as a top ranked result for the phrase search "Alexander Bell" even if you don't use "Graham" in your phrase search.
The first three results for a specific phrase/quote search only returns pages that point to pages with "Alexander G Bell" not with pages that use the three terms as a phrase on the actual page. Here's an example.
The results are relevant but it's not precisely what the searcher is asking for with the quotation marks. A discussion of the importance of providing the searcher with a better results set by adding the extra terms into the results set might be worth the time BUT should there also be a way for the searcher who users quote marks to get precisely what they are asking for?
More After a Click
Result number one is the Wikipedia page for Mr. Bell.
4. The Wikipedia page is also the first result for Alexander G Bell (no quotes). The cache info from Google says that the "G" on the first entry, again from Wikipedia, are NOT found on the page, they only appear in links pointing to it.
5. In conclusion, even Google's advanced search interface uses quotation marks when you enter terms into the phrase search box. Additionally, if the searcher asks for an exact phrase search they might not get precisely what they're asking for.
Perhaps what might be most important point for info pros to take away from the documentation and examples here is as a reminder that we need to be clear with users that the way one search tool works might not be another search tool handles the same query. For example, using quotes on xxx database will do specifically that while Google provides something different.
If you're wondering, the first 10 results on Bing for "Alexander Bell" provide a mix of exact phrase results with other entries for "Alexander Graham Bell."
With these and a few related questions (thanks again GOS) we will be contacting Google tomorrow.
A family of resources to help information workers be more effective, raise the value of information in their organisations and contribute to success. Read more »
Recently I have found myself cooing over visualisation maps (and heat maps) of health and well being resources. The content rich data is overlayed with mapping technologies, and some interesting themes and patterns are emerging.
A lot of the talk around social media in the last year has been around information overload. Social media has provided us with new and exciting ways to create content. But it has also meant learning new ways to manage and engage with social media tools. Are we teetering on the edge of an information overload precipice?
Information overload is a figment of your imagination. Or a failure of your filter. Or a symptom of your technological submissiveness. Depends on who you ask.
What if you had to sort through 3.5 million articles and social media posts a day and try to pull out the most relevant items for your organisation? What if you then had to cobble it all together into something readable for your top groups and executives in your organisation?
Alacra Compliance saves time by aggregating information from both free and fee-based sources and enabling users to conduct an accurate federated search across these sources (coined “simultaneous search” by Alacra).
FreePint Family
Quilting big data threads
The fallacy of information overload
Information overload: fact, fantasy or filter failure? 
