Receive the weekly sampler of posts and "Resource of the Week".
Subscribe »

Enter your
email address:

My Account »


Bookmark and Share

Testimonial?
If you find ResourceShelf useful, please supply a testimonial »








Home > ResourceBlog > Article

« All ResourceBlog Articles

 

Bookmark and Share   \"Feed\"

Saturday, 17th October 2009

Library Use of E-books: 2008-2009 Edition Reviewed in Learned Publishing

The PDF file available here is of a book review (really a "report" review) from the October, 2009 issue of Learned Publishing. The report being reviewed, Library Use of E-books: 2008-2009 Edition, was published by Primary Research.

Here are a Few of the Stats that are Included in the Review:

This is an update of a report that was first published last year, when the 2006–7 figures were analysed. It is heavily weighted towards academic libraries, and quite US-centric: 77.03% of the respondents were college or university librarians (as opposed to 22.97% public or special librarians); and78.38% of them worked in the US (as opposed to 21.62%‘non-US’ librarians).

One of the most interesting findings of the report is that librarians with the biggest budgets (of $4m or more) increased their expenditure on e-books much more in 2006–7 (when the average increase was 35%) than in 2007–8 (when the average increase was 14.2%). Even more markedly, librarians with budgets of between $1.5m and $4m increased their expenditure on e-books by an average of 53.3% between 2006 and 2007, but by an average of just 7.43% between 2007 and 2008.

[Snip]

Of the sample featured in the report, half had a NetLibrary contract, 34% used Gale Reference Library, 27% used Ebrary, and17.6% used Safari. Institutions with budgets of over $4m were seven times more likely to subscribe to Safari than others(which is not surprising, given that Safari has a specialist appeal, and libraries with smaller budgets tend to buy only very generalist e-book collections).

The libraries in the sample were relatively loyal to their e-book platform providers. On average, 77% expected to renew current contracts (with83% of academic librarians expecting to do so, and 61% of special/public librarians). 70% of the total spending on e-books in the sample was with aggregators; 24.6% was with individual publishers (the remaining 5.4% is not accounted for).

Much More After the Click

[Snip]

A surprising and disheartening statistic, given the effort that has been put into both producing and standardizing them, is that 80% of the respondents said that they did not use vendor-supplied usage statistics extensively.

[Snip]

The libraries in the sample spent a mean figure of $3,760 on e-books in the last year a significant but not astronomical sum when compared to print expenditure. (As a comparison, median ARL library expenditure on print monographs in 2007 was a little over $2m.)

Much More Including Analysis the Complete Review by Linda Bennett

Learned Publishing is a publication of the Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers, published in collaboration with the Society for Scholarly Publishing.

Source: Learned Publishing

See Also: Primary Research has More Statistics From the Report In This Media Release:

+ Well over 81% of the sample cataloged their e-book collection and listed it in their online library catalog.

+ For the most part, librarians in the sample felt that their patrons were less skilled in using e-book collections than they were in using databases of magazine, newspaper and journal articles.

+ The libraries in the sample had MARC records for a mean of approximately 74% of the e-books in their collections.

+ Many libraries reported significant use of electronic directories. 12.5% reported extensive use and 30% said that use was significant. The larger libraries reported the heaviest use.

+ Use of e-books in the hard sciences was particularly high. More than 30% of participants said that use of e-books in the hard sciences defined as chemistry, physics and biology)was quite extensive and another 26% noted significant use.

+ Libraries in the sample maintained a print version for a mean of 24% of the e-books in their e-book collections.

+ Nearly 21% of the libraries in our sample have digitized out-of-copyright books in their collections in order to make their contents more available to their patrons.

+ E-books account for only about 3.9% of the books on course reserve, with a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 30%.

+ Nearly 70% of the sample’s total spending on e-books was with aggregators, while just over 24.6% of the total spending was spent with individual publishers.


Category:

Views: 611



blog comments powered by Disqus

« All ResourceBlog Articles

 

Read about the FreePint FamilyThe FreePint Family is a family of resources to help information workers be more effective, raise the value of information in their organisations and contribute to success.

'FreePint... provides most of my professional development because it won't come through work and [other resources] just don't cut it.'

Read about the FreePint Family »


Visit the FreePint ShopFreePint Shop: FreePint sells reports, resources and subscription products to support your information work and information-related decisions.

Latest: FreePint Volume: Critical Insight on Social Media 2012 (01 Feb 2012) | FUMSI Report: Folio on Conferences and Continuing Professional Development (26 Jan 2012) | FreePint Research Report: Information Governance Policies and Priorities (25 Jan 2012) | Docuticker Report: DocuTips on Health Literacy (19 Jan 2012) | VIP Magazine: 98 (18 Jan 2012)

Browse the FreePint Shop »


FUMSI ForumFUMSI Forum: Do you have a research question? Post it to the FUMSI Forum, where professionals share Q&A and useful tips on how to Find, Use, Manage and Share Information. It's free.

Latest FUMSI Forum postings: Most Shared Content on Finding Information (09 Feb 2012) | Times are changing - a FUMSI Editorial (09 Feb 2012) | [TIPPLE] eBook resources - Share (07 Feb 2012) | Most Shared Content on Sharing Information (01 Feb 2012) | Our own worst enemy? - a FUMSI Editorial (01 Feb 2012)

Visit the FUMSI Forum and post »


VIP LiveWireVIP LiveWire: Offers commentary on emerging news stories of interest to premium content users, vendors and industry insiders.

Latest VIP LiveWire postings: Compliance - it's not just financial (10 Feb 2012) | Social media and BRIC - new report (08 Feb 2012) | Reuters takes the social media pulse (08 Feb 2012) | How to deal with the tech-savvy customer? (08 Feb 2012) | More ways for employers to poke around (01 Feb 2012)

Visit the VIP LiveWire »






Subscribe

Subscribe to the ResourceShelf Newsletter and receive the weekly sampler of posts and Resource of the Week.

Find out more »

ResourceShelf sponsored by:

Article Categories

All Article Categories »

Archive

All Archives »