Report: The Metadata is the Interface: Better Description for Better Discovery of Archives and Special Collections, Synthesized from User Studies
A recently released report from OCLC Research.
From the Introduction:
Structured metadata can be useful internally for collection management and public services, but is not always what users need most to discover primary sources, especially minimally-described collections and “hidden collections.” We understand archival standards for description and cataloging, but our users by and large don’t. Studies show that users often do not want to search for collections by provenance, for example, as important as this principle is for archival collections.5 One of several core competencies that special collections metadata librarians must have is “a keen understanding of users’ needs and preferences.” This is especially important now that discovery happens in multiple environments. Librarians and archivists need to manage archival collections by provenance, but also must describe what is in the collections for their users.
This essay—part of a series of OCLC Research projects to mobilize unique materials—synthesizes evidence of what descriptive information people say they need for research. As this literature review got underway, it soon became evident that we already know most of what we need to know in order to get started making changes.
The FreePint Family is a family of resources to help information workers be more effective, raise the value of information in their organisations and contribute to success.
'FreePint... provides most of my professional development because it won't come through work and [other resources] just don't cut it.'
FUMSI Forum: Do you have a research question? Post it to the FUMSI Forum, where professionals share Q&A and useful tips on how to Find, Use, Manage and Share Information. It's free.