Home > ResourceBlog > Article

« All ResourceBlog Articles

 

Feed

Monday, 27th April 2009

Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses

Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses

The evolution of the electronic age has led to the development of numerous medical databases on the World Wide Web, offering search facilities on a particular subject and the ability to perform citation analysis. We compared the content coverage and practical utility of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. The official Web pages of the databases were used to extract information on the range of journals covered, search facilities and restrictions, and update frequency. We used the example of a keyword search to evaluate the usefulness of these databases in biomedical information retrieval and a specific published article to evaluate their utility in performing citation analysis. All databases were practical in use and offered numerous search facilities. PubMed and Google Scholar are accessed for free. The keyword search with PubMed offers optimal update frequency and includes online early articles; other databases can rate articles by number of citations, as an index of importance. For citation analysis, Scopus offers about 20% more coverage than Web of Science, whereas Google Scholar offers results of inconsistent accuracy. PubMed remains an optimal tool in biomedical electronic research. Scopus covers a wider journal range, of help both in keyword searching and citation analysis, but it is currently limited to recent articles (published after 1995) compared with Web of Science. Google Scholar, as for the Web in general, can help in the retrieval of even the most obscure information but its use is marred by inadequate, less often updated, citation information.—Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E I., Malietzis, G. A., and Pappas, G. Comparison of Pub Med, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses.

+ Full Paper (PDF; 71 KB)

Source: FASEB Journal (Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology)

Hat tip: RH


Category:




« All ResourceBlog Articles

 

FreePint

FreePint supports the value of information in the enterprise. Read more »


FeedLatest FreePint Content:


  • Click to view the article Source Update for Factiva
    Tuesday, 7th July 2015

    The latest additions and takedowns in Factiva, researched and compiled by Anne Jordan.

  • Click to view the article Product Review of FirstWord Pharma PLUS (Introduction; Value; Contact Details)
    Tuesday, 7th July 2015

    FirstWord Pharma PLUS, the personalised news, analysis and expert opinion service for pharmaceutical industry professionals, is introduced here by Robyn Smith in the first part of her product review. As the premier information platform within the suite of FirstWord Group's bioindustry products, she considers audience, access and value.

  • Click to view the article Results from FreePint Research into Skills Part 3 - Strategy and Resources
    Monday, 6th July 2015

    In part three of her analysis Robin Neidorf reports further on FreePint's research into how information professionals address skills development. The research included a series of questions to understand the state of strategic planning around skills development, including: the impact of strategy, leadership and organisational culture on information skills investment, strategic planning to meet information skills needs, and budget & resource considerations. We also asked what needs to change in terms of additional or alternative resources or training for information professionals and knowledge workers.

  • ... more ...

All FreePint Content »
FreePint Topics »


A FreePint Subscription delivers articles and reports that support your organisation's information practice, content and strategy.

Find out more and order a FreePint Subscription by visiting the
completing our online form: Subscription Order page.


FreePint Testimonials

"FreePint has lots of content that looks really interesting to read, I look forward to getting my teeth into it." Information Officer, Law firm

Read more testimonials and supply yours »






 

 
 
 

Register

Register to receive the free ResourceShelf Newsletter, featuring highlighted posts.

Find out more »

Article Categories

All Article Categories »

Archive

All Archives »