Justice Ginsburg Releases Library Case File, Material Redacted Now Available
Justice Ginsburg's Oct. 7 in-chambers opinion in this case had been redacted to remove material that was then under seal. The Court has now released an unredacted version of her opinion. The nature of the deletions provides a clear illustration of how closely federal prosecutors were monitoring what could be revealed publicly about this mostly-secret case.
The case began about a year ago when the FBI, in a secret demand to a group later identified as the Library Collection, a consortium of 26 Connecticut libraries, to see patrons' electronic records. The FBI was using what is called a "National Security Letter," authorized by the Patriot Act passed after the 9/11 attacks, to find out what readers had been viewing or reading online, supposedly as part of a terrorism investigation. Such a Letter does not require a court's approval, and the party handed such a letter cannot acknowledge publicly that it received it, or even identify itself. In the Connecticut case, it was later revealed, the FBI was interested in who had used a single computer, believing a terrorist threat had originated on that device.
The FreePint Family is a family of resources to help information workers be more effective, raise the value of information in their organisations and contribute to success.
'FreePint... provides most of my professional development because it won't come through work and [other resources] just don't cut it.'
FUMSI Forum: Do you have a research question? Post it to the FUMSI Forum, where professionals share Q&A and useful tips on how to Find, Use, Manage and Share Information. It's free.