--
ResourceShelf Contributing Editor, Steven Cohen, shares a comment or two:
So, it seems that Google is starting a partnership with a few libraries across the country, which will include the digitation of all of the books in the collections and make them available on Google Print. Wow.
According to Search Engine Watch, "At the University of Michigan, the plan is to scan seven million titles over a six year period using a non-destructive scanning technology that Google has developed. The university will also be given a copy of each file to use as they see fit. A "digitize the complete library" arrangement is also the current plan at Stanford and Oxford, and the New York Public Library will also be running a pilot project."
This is sure to make waves across the library world. On one hand, making library materials available on Google could result in libraries getting more attention from users. In fact, it could be a great marketing tool for the participating libraries. On the other hand, what makes Google certain that they will reach potential users of the system? As we have found out with Open WorldCat, just because data is part of a database, it doesn't mean people will find it. Considering that Google will not be providing a specific search query system for this service, it will probably be just as tough to find materials from the participating libraries. Making a database bigger doesn't make it better.
I've heard the "If you can't beat 'em, join 'em" approach before with Google (and I'm not implying that this is one of those instances), but libraries should be pushing their own materials through their websites rather than having to "rely" on Google to do so.
That said, I'm taking the wait-and-see approach with this new partnership. It could indeed have a very positive effect on users' attitutes towards libraries, but there could also be negative consequences.
--
--
Comments from ResourceShelf Contributing Editor, Dan Giancaterino
Here's the bottom line for Jenkins Law Library (where I work), which btw is 200 years old. About 1% of our collection is "out of copyright," i.e., published before 1900 (my arbitrary date.) These titles have accounted for less than one-half of 1% of total uses (checkout, internal use, copying, and ILL) in the last 10 years. Digitizing these titles sounds great, but it really won't help our users very much."
--
--
See Also: Some are leery of Google's online data project (via SLC Tribune/AP)
See Also: Google's digital books plan not user perfect (via Chicago Tribune/AP)
The FreePint Family is a family of resources to help information workers be more effective, raise the value of information in their organisations and contribute to success.
'FreePint... provides most of my professional development because it won't come through work and [other resources] just don't cut it.'
FUMSI Forum: Do you have a research question? Post it to the FUMSI Forum, where professionals share Q&A and useful tips on how to Find, Use, Manage and Share Information. It's free.
FreePint Shop:
VIP LiveWire:
